Recent Reviews

Hon. Mary Ann Ullman Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, Pennsylvania

5

547. party to case (with attorney)

Very strong judge. Her decisions are based solely on rules , code and the law set forth . She is firm and leaves no room for errors . Whether one agrees with her decisions or not , she is highly respected.

Hon. Peter W. Schmehl Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, Pennsylvania

1

546. other

This judge has too many cases to be able to devote the proper time to each case before him. The cases range from criminal cases to family court cases. To much involvement causes conflicts which he has proven. His confusion of law makes it very difficult to address. His conduct needs to be brought to the attention of his superiors as well . He is easily mislead by attorneys who manipulate the system , not that it is his fault 100% however it should be made aware of to him of such unethical practices before him. Im sure he would not be to happy about it. Overall he is not a bad judge he is very passionate about his cases however the overload hiders too many other cases. No case should be at risk.

1

544. party to case (pro se)

Judge Sentelle is extremely Anti-American and hates Disabled Veterans, hates Pro Se Litigants, and is extremely dishonest when a Disabled Veteran, or Pro Se Litigant, comes before his Court without an attorney. Judge Sentelle AVOIDED military service, using his "influence" and wealth, and hates those that do serve this country, yet he enjoys the freedoms our Veterans provide this strongly Anti-American Judge. He will intentionally lie to deny the Disabled Veterans access to the Courts. This judge is OWNED by the Corporations, and those born with silver spoons in their mouths, especally if they avoid military service, like Judge Sentelle. Yet it should be noted that Judge Sentelle has spent most of his life feeding at the public trough, and yet he hates those that shed their blood to provide him such an easy and lavish life. Judge Sentelle is only given a one because there is no lower number. He is not fit, and lacks the ethics, and morals, to be a judge.

1

543. party to case (pro se)

Judge Henderson hates Disabled Veterans, hates Pro Se Litigants, and is extremely dishonest when a Pro Se Litigants comes before without an attorney. She will intentionally lie to deny the Disabled Veterans access to the Courts. This judge is OWNED by the Corporations.

Hon. Matthew J. Gary Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, California

1

542. attorney (private practice)

Horrible. He lectures everyone. Ego maniacal.

Hon. Deborah L. Christian Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, California

1

541. party to case (with attorney)

Agree with over reviews...also she has ex parte communications with attorneys over the phone, via her clerk, etc...She tries to come off as fair and impartial but definitely is not...she definitely has her favorites...i.e those she believes to have more political power.

Hon. Jan A. Pluim Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, California

3

540. party to case (with attorney)

Had limited interaction with him, and although he comes off as a hard-nose, because he seems to apply his hard-nose demeanor to all parties equally, he seems to get the job done and seems somewhat fair. However, he does break the rules when if comes to ex parte communications with attorneys...he actually took opposing counsel into his chambers for a private conversation during a hearing....

Hon. Gayle Williams-Byers South Euclid Municipal Court, Ohio

1

539. party to case (with attorney)

She is unfair and biased. Don't expect justice from her decision.

Hon. Gerald C. Jessop Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, California

1

538. other

This judge did not listen to any of the evidence before him. He flat-out agreed with the mother of the children in a custody dispute without her providing any evidence. As it turned out, she lied in court and still got more custody than had been suggested by a mediator. He refused to hear arguments by the father of the children and was completely biased towards the mother for no reason at all. The mother has been (and continues to be) confrontational in front of her children towards their father and picks fights. She's abusing child care costs towards her roommate and has yet to provide proof of times when the roommate watches the kids or how much she pays him. This judge should have reviewed the facts of the case and looked at the evidence before him and put the children first like he is supposed to do.

Hon. Nelson Keith Brooks Superior Court of California, County of El Dorado, California

1

537. party to case (with attorney)

Hon Nelson Keith Brooks is not qualified to be a judge He needs more experience. He puts the good people of Eldorado county lives in danger.please vote for a more qualified judge.