Recent Reviews

Hon. Elisabeth Sichel Superior Court of California, County of Riverside, California

1

1312. other

To little value put on young lives.. Try to prove herself by hardliner decisions, without any consideration for minor offences and repercussions to these individuals.

Hon. Thomas P. Anderle Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara, California

2

1309. party to case (pro se)

Judge Thomas Anderle has a reputation for making up his mind and not changing it even in the face of significant contradictory facts. In my case, he refused to remove himself for bias after 8 individuals associated with me case signed declarations stating that he was not impartial.

Hon. Peter F. Rogers Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania

1

1308. other

I am appalled by how this judge acted during my custody hearing...i had evidence that he refused to see and threatened to take my son from me for no reason at all...disgusting!

Hon. Andrea Plumlee District Court, 330th District Court, Dallas County, Texas

5

1304. party to case (with attorney)

The Honorable Judge Plumlee is a wonderful public servant and fair in her proceedings. I was represented by an attorney but represented myself Pro Se for half of the life of the active case. Judge Plumlee, regarding Pro Se litigants, is patient, kind and has a wonderful demeanor to those who act accordingly; you are in a court room, there are standards and first impression do count; those are on you. I might add that I am the Father in this case; was awarded Managing Conservator of my child and judge Plumlee sustained that ruling several times. These accounts of her being, unfair biased against fathers - are completely unfounded and most likely the result of the common human emotion of anger at the result of being told something you didn't want to hear or further being ordered. One must also take note of the court rules and procedures. If she didn't read something of yours "in your opinion" most likely it is due to - she already familiarized herself with the case; YOU didn't file it correctly or within the rules and procedure of the court or you just don't have a leg to stand on and the best option for you is to defame the person who has been charged by the public to sort out YOUR dirty laundry. All in all Judge Plumlee is a wonderful public servant in the MONSTER that is Dallas County Family Courts. Lastly; its not whats in your personal interest but the best interest of the child. A third party Non Lay person such as Judge Plumlee is far better qualified to sort it out then you; if you could, you wouldn't be before her at the bar now would you.

Hon. Diane Haddock District Court, 233rd District Court, Tarrant County, Texas

0

1303. party to case (pro se)

Went in front of this mean judge my ex took our money so I could not hire an attorney. I said my name and she asked are you from Boston I replied yes are all guys from Boston gangsters are all guys from Boston Bullies do all guys from Boston go around blowing people up at marathons I replied with what did you just say and that was it she wouldn't let me speak told me I am a horrible Dad and sided with my ex on everything. Keep in mind this was two days after the bombing in Boston in which I had friends at the finish line. I have been told by so many people how great of a Dad I am and now I don't see my children and I can't see my Dog. This judge is a disgrace to the legal system and should step down she has no idea the damage she does to families she will not listen to reason or facts she says what she wants and uses her power to hurt innocent people. I have to go back in front of her tomorrow not looking forward to it. I have heard so many people complain about her is there anything that can be done to remove her from being a judge

Hon. Tamiko A. Amaker Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York

1

1302. witness

Most corrupt Judge I have ever known. Where did she get the money to buy her estate in Fieldstone?

Hon. Thomas Rubinson Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, California

1

1301. attorney (non-profit practice)

Pre-juducied, egocentric. Promotes LAPD corruption Up for re-election

Hon. Susan J. Matcham Superior Court of California, County of Monterey, California

0

1300. party to case (with attorney)

I have to agree with most of the previous comments above mine. This Judge is horrible and does a great injustice to fathers and children alike. She is very bias towards the mother even if the mother is wrong. She has refused to hear the opinion of a child over the age of 14 even though the child is uncomfortable and doesn't want to be in the mothers home were the mothers boyfriend is angry toward the children and verbal violent and there is proof of this and an evaluation by a court appointed evaluator was done properly. She refused to even look at the evaluation. She chooses to leave children in unhealthly physical and emotional strained enviroment against the evaluator, theripist, and child over 14's wishes . Kimberly is so on point. This judge doesn't look at the law or follow the family codes set forth by the state at all. She needs to be removed promptly! How can the people of Monterey county allow such disgrace by this woman.

Hon. Susan J. Matcham Superior Court of California, County of Monterey, California

0

1298. party to case (with attorney)

This judge needs to be removed immediately how does she look herself in the mirror everyday knowing the bad choices she is forcing upon others. Forcing children to be with an abusive parent, never looking at the facts! She is prejudice and unfair taking it out on the party who is not at fault. She makes cases worst and dragges them out for years for no reason costing families thousands of unnecessary expenses. She is giving the court system a bad name!

Hon. Guadalupe O. Mendoza County Court, County Court at Law, Kleberg County, Texas

5

1297. attorney (private practice)

I HAVE BEEN BEFORE HER HONOR IN A DIVORCE TRIAL AND FOUND HER TO BE VERY FAIR, WELL VERSED IN THE LAW, AND POSSESSING A GOOD JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT. THE PROCEEDINGS WERE EMOTIONAL, LENGTHY AND HEATED AND I THOUGHT SHE DID A VERY GOOD JOB. I HAVE OVER 25 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN THE COURT ROOM AND SHE WAS A NEW JUDGE AT THE TIME. INCIDENTALLY, MY OPPOSING COUNSEL WAS HER FORMER PARTNER (AND PRESUMABLY A FRIEND OF HERS) AND SHE SHOWED NO FAVORITISM - ONLY FAIRNESS. MIND YOU, I DIDN'T LOVE ALL OF HER FINDINGS AND RULINGS; BUT SHE WAS FAIR.