Hon. Susan M. Speer

Judge Speer's Average Overall Review:

4 Stars

Based on 6 reviews

  Unknown

  Unknown (fax)

  Unknown address

  Unknown email address

Reviews

5

5695. other

She is very good with people with PTSD.. Mental health... She gives attention and care... And does not let the DA railroad you... God bless her..


5

8624. other

She is very reasonable and a great judge, I was bless to have her as my judge,God bless her.. But 17 years??.. At least you she given me a second chance to freedom...and that's all I got to say about that..


5

8625. other

She is very reasonable and a great judge, I was bless to have her as my judge,God bless her.. But 17 years??.. At least you she given me a second chance to freedom...and that's all I got to say about that..


5

8626. other

She is very reasonable and a great judge, I was bless to have her as my judge,God bless her.. But 17 years??.. At least you she given me a second chance to freedom...and that's all I got to say about that..


1

9063. other

First of all three of the rating is made by one person. Judge Speer in my observation allowed the prosecutor free range, and defense obviously felt helpless as he did not do a independent investigation "none". In addition, evidence was agreed excluded in one court, yet after almost year it was permitted . Counsel, was given continuation to look for possible favorable witness , counsel argue the time was already allotted to a prior arrangement. A court chamber hearing was agreed by counsel which was totally against the defendant's right yet he never explained to his client the loss of rights and preceded and agreed to the judge asking all questions by phone to juror who was giving coverage, lack face of the accused. The case went on with numerous other incompetent non acts of the defense counsel. The court had the full justification to dismissed but allowed it proceeded , led to guilty decision.


1

9064. other

First of all three of the rating is made by one person. Judge Speer in my observation allowed the prosecutor free range, and defense obviously felt helpless as he did not do a independent investigation "none". In addition, evidence was agreed excluded in one court, yet after almost year it was permitted . Counsel, was given continuation to look for possible favorable witness , counsel argue the time was already allotted to a prior arrangement. A court chamber hearing was agreed by counsel which was totally against the defendant's right yet he never explained to his client the loss of rights and preceded and agreed to the judge asking all questions by phone to juror who was giving coverage, lack face of the accused. The case went on with numerous other incompetent non acts of the defense counsel. There was numerous incompetent signs of the defense that was not corrected or blind eye . The court had the full justification to dismissed but allowed it proceeded , led to guilty decision. The bench ruled over the same office she prior supervised as a prosecutor. The counsel who freelanced on this case. Was assigned by the same two serve with co counsel on a capital case by the same judge, and attorney was clearly focusing all efforts on the capital case.


Review this Judge

This website is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. Gavel Bangers does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, Gavel Bangers may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and may remove content for any reason whatsoever, without consent. Disrespectful, profane, rambling, illiterate, and ALL CAPS comments will be deleted.